The pie charts illustrates the outcome of a survey about people of two different age groups which includes activities that makes them most happy in life.
Overall, It shows that people who are over and under 30 years of age are seen to be most happy when they achieve a certain objectives from their task both the age groups are seen to be happy from this factor as compared to other factors both the age group show's less interest in other factors.
It shows that 31% of people who are under 30 experience happiness when they get achievement from work. Where 22% of them where also happy from the hobbies in which they were interested in. People who were having a good appearance also felt most happy when they looked good it shows that 18% of them were happy by their outer look. However people were less interested in Travelling and other factors it shows that only 15%&14% were happy from these factors which is very less as compared to how happy they get when they achieve certain objectives from their work and doing hobbies.
Achievement from work is also one of the most liked factor amongst people who were over 30 years of age. The report shows that 32% of people were found to be most happy when they get success from their work which is also 1% higher than that of people who were under 30 years. These People also seemed to be very happy while doing their hobbies record shows that people over 30 years outreached those who were under 30 by 2%. whereas, some of them had also made financial savings for future use which shows that 20% of people were happy with this factor. The least interest was shown for factors like being with family and other factors where only 14%&10% people were happy with it. Moreover, despite being older then those who are under 30 years people who were over 30 were seen to be most happy when they achieve from their work life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'objective'?
Suggestion: objective
... most happy when they achieve a certain objectives from their task both the age groups are...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ss when they get achievement from work. Where 22% of them where also happy from the h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...of them were happy by their outer look. However people were less interested in Travelli...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...y from these factors which is very less as compared to how happy they get when the...
^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y happy while doing their hobbies record shows that people over 30 years outreach...
^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...treached those who were under 30 by 2%. whereas, some of them had also made financial s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 708, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'older than'?
Suggestion: older than
... happy with it. Moreover, despite being older then those who are under 30 years people who...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 7.0 414% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 31.0 3.15609756098 982% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 5.60731707317 678% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 340.0 196.424390244 173% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52352941176 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.93493649476 2.65546596893 73% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.385294117647 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8524824206 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203458176694 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113787261715 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791646865104 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190508701319 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979706867235 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.