The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The bar charts reveal the change in how many students who graduated and postgraduate in the United Kingdom that choose destination for work excluding full-time job after finishing college in 2008.
Overall, it is evident that while the figures for graduate and postgraduate students witnessed the largest numbers, students did into voluntary work were identical with the lowest points both the two charts. In 2008, the number of graduate students had far higher than students who were postgraduate pupils.
Looking at the first chart about graduate students, there was reached a peak of 29.655 students who continued further study, followed by students did part-time job, stood at 17.735 students. By contrast, how many graduate students worked as voluntary hit a bottom, just 3.500 students which had lower nearly 10 times than the number of students did further study.
Similarly, the chart of postgraduate students in 2008 saw the same trend, compared with the first chart. In addition, there was the biggest number of students who did further study, at 2.728 students, the opposite was true for the figure for students who completing college that did voluntary work. Specially, the total students worked as part-time job saw a significant increase, with 2.535 students, just lower 100 students than the data of further study. Besides, the figure for students unemployment of graduate students was far higher 10.000 times than that of United Kingdom postgraduate students in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was far higher 10.000 times than that of United Kingdom postgraduate students in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, look, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35319148936 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60568032213 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493617021277 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1393771264 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.777777778 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389699237593 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199049172487 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536633442136 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281940413672 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284362503831 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.