the charts below shows the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney in 1997 and 2007
The given charts illustrates the water consumption of numerous sectors of Sydney citizens in two years - 1997 and 2007.
Overall, while water usage of food industry was highest, building industry accounted for lowest percentage of consumption in both years.
It is obviously seen that in 2007, there was 48% water used for food industry which was the highest consumption in total. This figure decreased by 7% in 2007. Service and building sectors witness the same trend. To be more specific, the rate of service industry’s water usage decreased from 15% in 1997 to 11% in 2007 while the water consumption in building sector which felt to 2% in 2007 accounted for the smallest water usage in both years.
In a sharp contrast, this figure of housing usage slightly increased in this period, from 19% to 21%. Besides, the percentage of water use for manufacturing sector in 1997 was 13% which nearly thdoubled to 25% in 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69838266689 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.502074077 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316223407937 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150489511781 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113974721748 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212951728074 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935691018869 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.