The chart illustrates the information about international trade earnings through Petroleum products, engineered goods, gems and jewellery, agricultural products and textile industry in a particular nation in 2015 and 2016. The table provides the details regarding movements of earning in 2016 with compared to 2015.
Overall,in 2015 and 2016, petroleum goods and Engineered products had played a significant role to the economy as earning around 60 billions and table shows the all industries has increased their gain except Gems and jewellery production.
Earnings from gems and jewellery items was over 40 billions while agricultural products contributed around 30 billions in both years. These two categories had not much significant changes in earnings during this period. However garments industry had increased their gain by around 5 billion after one year.
According to the table, Textile sector was the most important sector to the economy because it has a 15.24% of growth in 2016 while other industries serving below 10% of growth rates. (Petroleum products - 3%, Engineered Goods- 8.5% and gricultural products- 0.81% respectively). On the other hand gems and jewellery market had dropped by 5.18% in 2016 when compared with last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...n 2016 with compared to 2015. Overall,in 2015 and 2016, petroleum goods and Engi...
^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... petroleum goods and Engineered products had played a significant role to the eco...
^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...changes in earnings during this period. However garments industry had increased their g...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56544502618 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83566367862 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607329842932 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9765810532 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187699538665 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834233349873 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688070918516 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119274368779 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561852328207 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.