Describe provided map which illustrating what changes have happened in Foton and Meadowside.

Essay topics:

Describe provided map which illustrating what changes have happened in Foton and Meadowside.

The below maps provide information about how Foton, a small city, and Meadowside village have grown in three different periods of time (1962, 1985, and present).

Generally, it is evident that few number of facilities and infrastructures have built over five decades. Moreover, both village and town have increased in the size as they have merged together.

In 1962, both Foton and Meadowside were completely separate and there was no way of communication between them. Just a railway line running to the north in Foton and a small road from the west to the north in Meadowside were the possible way.

The size of both village and town had significantly increased in 1985. The only way in Meadowside had improved technically, and a subsidiary way had connected the suburb and town together. In addition, a super market in the south of the way as well as leisure complex and housing estate in the north had also built in Meadowside.

Today, the railway has branched from the main line to the west in Foton where a station has constructed for passengers. Besides, a hotel and park have been prepared in both sides of the station.

As a result, the region has dramatically changed due to city and village extension. Moreover, various ways of communications have brought several facilities to this district.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...sent. Generally, it is evident that a few number of facilities and infrastructures have ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9592760181 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8409587935 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.246031446 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148776640294 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525016251615 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039838996904 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787653410555 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426579383326 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.