The diagram below shows changes in modes of transport chosen by travellers in a Europen country from 1950 to 1990

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows changes in modes of transport chosen by travellers in a Europen country from 1950 to 1990

The bar charts shows the transport chosen by people from 1950 to 1990.
The graph shows 21% people chose commute by in 1950, where 32% people opted bikes. Almost, 7% selected travel by car and about 40% selected travel by foot.
In 1970, public transport was high compared to other way. Where, maximum number of people's travelled by bus it was 32%, followed by 27% who used cars and were in turn followed by 23% who chose bikes. Proportion of people and at that only 17% preferred to walk.
However, in 1990 most of people preferred travel by car it was 63%, next the mode chosen by approximately 16% was the bus, bikes and walking were around 10% of travellers.
Finally, the graph indicate car indeed became the prime choice over the period 1959 to 1990 in European country.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
The bar charts shows the transport chosen by people from 195...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to commute'
Suggestion: to commute
...1990. The graph shows 21% people chose commute by in 1950, where 32% people opted bike...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...7% preferred to walk. However, in 1990 most of people preferred travel by car it was 63%, nex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 642.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61870503597 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22515089752 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625899280576 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 180.0 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0030046919 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.25 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211032881191 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101008976736 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115445716327 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145170395704 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128154604648 0.0819641961636 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.