Nowadays the way very people interact with each other has change because of technology in what ways has technology affected types of relationship people may this become a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way very people interact with each other has change because of technology in what ways has technology affected types of relationship people may?this become a positive or negative development.

Nowadays, technology has more upgrades. It is very important in our daily routine life. Many people prefer to chatting or intrect on social website that for many people believe technology affected relationship.
Technology has its own advantages and drawbacks. There are immense disadvantages. Firstly, being with people are more depends on it. Moreover, it is very expand over the limit. Without internet we can not chatting or interact with other person because internet is main source of technology. That's for the people avoid face to face meeting. When thet have work that time they are talking on social websites like, messages, calling, and e-mail. Secondly, people more reliable on it. Additionally, they are not share their emotions, thaught, because when thet are happy then they are put emojin on it. They are built wall to other people. When they are not getting internet in any particular area they become irritated. However, for this reason they can not focus on their study, because always their mind in it. Nowadays, 80% people depends on it.
However, technology is a boon for those who are more reliable on it. With the help of our life become more easy. For example, they have need any items then they are purchase online with help of the technology. In the world any corner we can chatting with the help of it. Additionally, people can work at their home because nowadays technology has more upgrad.
Pendown, that's for the people avoiding face to face meetings and interaction. Technology is important in our life but up to limited use.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'chat'?
Suggestion: chat
...ily routine life. Many people prefer to chatting or intrect on social website that for m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'chat'
Suggestion: chat
... the limit. Without internet we can not chatting or interact with other person because i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... internet is main source of technology. Thats for the people avoid face to face meeti...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 636, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t. They are built wall to other people. When they are not getting internet in any pa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'chat'
Suggestion: chat
...hnology. In the world any corner we can chatting with the help of it. Additionally, peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...s technology has more upgrad. Pendown, thats for the people avoiding face to face me...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97701149425 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55322519793 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501915708812 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 28.4571777252 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.4782608696 106.682146367 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.347826087 20.7667163134 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226329630651 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704454209008 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514833984876 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15541850816 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466071817441 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.0946893788 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 50.2224549098 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.42 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.