The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar graph depicts information on the number of people who owned a telephone among nine Southeast Asian countries and is measured in thousands. The study covers a period of five years with emphasis on the year 2000, 2002 and 2004.
Overall, It can be seen that Singapore held the highest number owners for landline phones while the least came from Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Vietnam. It is also clear that at the end of the study period, no more people were recorded to own a telephone in Indonesia, Lao PDR and Thailand.
In detail, Singapore held the most number of landline phone owners in 2000 to 2002 with over 450 thousand which was almost twice as that of Brunei Darussalam with 250 thousand. Philippines and Thailand followed with about 80 thousand while Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Vietnam shared no more than 50 thousand for four years.
Within the next two years, both Singapore and Brunei Darussalam marginally declined but still had more than 400 thousand and 200 thousand landline phone owners, respectively. Vietnam and Philippines had partly similar rates with about 50 thousand while Myanmar had no more than 10 thousand. Thailand which had over 50 thousand of telephone owners from 2000 – 2002 had zero along with Indonesia and Lao PDR.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one in Indonesia, Lao PDR and Thailand. In detail, Singapore held the most numbe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99078341014 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48017046064 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0801361927 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112818196472 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604728257796 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423783483378 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910066746003 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586861012929 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.