The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates different steps in recycling plastic bottles. There are nine main steps in the process, beginning with throwing the plastic bottles into the recycled trash can and ending with the new goods made from old plastic bottles.
The first step is collecting the used bottles from trash cans. There is a specialized car for this job. Subsequently, workers from the recycling center will classify all the bottles. The bottles which reach the standard can be sent to the next step, whereas the others are rejected. After the classification stage, all of the bottles will be compressed into many cubes in order to crush them easily, and then the debris of plastic bottles is going to be washed.
The process continues with the producing plastic pellets step. Workers put the plastic debris into a machine which can form a round shape of it. The next stage is heating the pellets until they melt and become raw material form. The raw material then are ready to produce products. The final step is the complete goods that are created by plastic bottles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...jected. After the classification stage, all of the bottles will be compressed into many cu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ial then are ready to produce products. The final step is the complete goods that a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92817679558 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38265713751 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2343823863 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3333333333 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155009719803 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584734770527 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441885503959 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11430262977 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446576176111 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.