Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some say that these are the best people to talk to school students about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that students should be educated about the consequences of committing crimes by ex-prisoners. However, I firmly believe that these people are not suitable for teaching students in this field.
Let ex-prisoners tell students about the results of doing illegal actions can cause detrimental effects to them. To begin with, it can be risky due to the high chances of recommitting crime of people who have been in prison. According to the New York Times, 47% of ex-prisoners still commit crimes after they are released. Because of this reason, many people do not believe in ex-prisoners and they will not allow their children to listen to the speech. For example, teachers often tell students not to interact with ex-prisoners even though they have become good people. Students can copy their bad habits and then become criminals in the future.
Moreover, there are many methods to teach students about the dangers of committing a crime. School can cooperate with police to raise awareness of students. Compared with ex-prisoners, police are more trustworthy and they are trained to capture criminals, so they would have a better knowledge about laws, rules, or policies. Furthermore, parents, and teachers also play an important role in raising the awareness of students about crime. For instant, they can add moral lessons in the class, and create a positive education environment in order to contributing to crime prevention.
In conclusion, students should not be taught about crime by ex-prisoners, otherwise, schools and parents can use others teaching method to raise awareness of students for not committing crime in the futre.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25939849624 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80683096632 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563909774436 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1821064214 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256113765327 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994977674734 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498734105541 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165402142482 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410369582155 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.