Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation's history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
It is true that historical buildings are defended by the government because of its intangible cultural value. While some people believed that these constructions ought to be replaced by other modern buildings at the request of the increasing infrastructure nowadays.
First of all, historical buildings have an abundant value that cannot be seen by eye's. They are the witness of historic and monumental events of the country. To illustrate, Thang Long Imperial Citadel is a complex of relics associated with the history of Thang Long - Hanoi citadel starting from the pre-Thang Long period through the Dinh - Tien Le dynasties and flourishing under the Ly, Tran, Le dynasties, this is a massive architectural work and has become the most important relic in the system of relics in Vietnam. More than that, historical sites are the architectural achievements because they are invaluable in art or construction. For instance, the tomb of Khai Dinh has a special construct with a fascinating fusion of Asian and European touches.
Secondly, it is apparent that the government should associate contemporary and immortal buildings in their master plan. Many old buildings have been preserved as attraction destinations for tourism or become administration offices. In this way, historical sites can still exist with the new unique and appealing look. Furthermore, it also boosted the tourism industry of the country.
To sum up, it is clear that historical buildings are protected by many countries for many benefits. Despite the opinion that old buildings should be replaced by other modern landmarks, I believe that these old buildings need to be preserved and maintained for their unique value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cause of its intangible cultural value. While some people believed that these constru...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, first of all, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37453183521 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01330869603 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.0789599528 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313216747855 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10078348896 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086581680976 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199884205659 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994684942241 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.