The diagram show changes in a student common room

Essay topics:

The diagram show changes in a student common room.

The diagram depicts modifications to the unspecified layout of student common area in around five years ago and at present.
Overall, a number of extensive renovations took place all over the site. Seeing relative re-arrangement of the tables in the middle of the room and modest changes to some amenities to its the right side.
In past five years, the fundamental room of students was constructed with two benches in the middle of uppermost in the area. At the present, however, either of them which was adjacent to microwave was replace by other new microwave. Incredibly, other amenities belonging to the uppermost part have been remained in their correct order.
There were four sets tables surrounded by 6 pieces 5 years ago which occupied most area of the room. Up to now, two of them was transformed into new facilities. The one was demolished to make away for a 9-pieces rectangular table set, especially the other one was replace by the bench for laptop being next to the former site of cabin. A set of television and three armchair surround was place on the original site of the cabin. Moreover, the automatic drinks machine was added in front of the refrigerator.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...and modest changes to some amenities to its the right side. In past five years, th...
^^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...table set, especially the other one was replace by the bench for laptop being next to t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87562189055 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76400287415 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601990049751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.52055262 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0909090909 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132118949896 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466968661928 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687174860064 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960551933598 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666810696803 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.