The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The charts depict the modifications to the layout of an unspecified theater in the years of 2010 and 2012.
Overall, the number of changes tool place all over the layout of building. Besides some existing features was converted or removed in the process. The only exception was located in the center of the area which was unchanged over the given period.
In 2010, the building could be accessed from the main entrance to the south through which a café was situated in the right corner and opposite to the ticket office as well as admin office. In the next two years, however, ticket office was relocated on the original site of café. Whereas, admin office was removed to the rear. This changes were to make way for new restaurants in the site at the back left corner.
The auditorium being in the middle of the building saw no modification trend over the given period. Meanwhile, the stage in front of was enlarge nearly double size with the addition of a side hall behind it. The old media and storage were replaced to the left and right hand side respectively. Especially, there were the new showers constructed next to the media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...relocated on the original site of café. Whereas, admin office was removed to the rear. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enlarged'.
Suggestion: enlarged
...d. Meanwhile, the stage in front of was enlarge nearly double size with the addition of...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... showers constructed next to the media.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.705 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45413426691 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4201993145 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4166666667 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089334921984 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323723691223 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619802691691 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756681110332 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859852927852 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.