Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
In modern times, there has been a surge in a huge amount of foodstuff produced by other parts all over the world that are imported to meet domestic needs by numerous governments. In my perspective, this tendency has both positive and negative effects in equal measure.
On the one hand, there are wealth of advantages can be gained by the trend. The most would be that in doing so, local citizens can be widen loads of choices in the food market in which have a wide range of brands, products, quality and diverse prices. Owing to various market, customers can satisfactorily go to expenses food which are not appropriate their income, but highly quality and particularly suitable for their needs. With respect to domestic companies, chains of retail stores like supermarkets and grocery stores would have more valuable options to select the best supplier with intriguing deals making a huge profit. Furthermore, this trend makes a paramount contribution to the increasing expenditures of residents leading to growth significantly state budgets by taxes. Especially, some kinds of food can be cultivated in certain weather condition of imported nations due to unfavorable conditions, lack of technical equipment, poor farming and manufacturing methods and so on. In some cases, Japan, for instance, the import’ spending on some sort of meat like beef is more affordable than national one.
One the other hand, the downside of this tendency should not be overlooked in several reasons. With respect to quality of some kinds of foodstuff, especially fresh food like vegetation, meat, seafood, and other, some preservatives may be used in order to keep food fresh during a long journey. By doing so, there are adverse impacts on residents’ health. Besides, the usage of transportations such as airplanes, ships has been increasing day in and day out would boost fossil fuel combustion and release tons of carbon dioxide to atmosphere that have detrimental effects on environment. Moreover, it is more likely domestic products must try to take up a struggle with imported on in market. By that it means, some customers would tend to have a bias toward foreign food rather than national ones. If the trend arises, domestic manufactures have a mount of income an unexpected.
In my own view, although I do not deny the importance of importing food to meet residents’ demands, earn a huge amount of profits as well. I still believe the aforementioned trend could pose hindrances to a nation in some ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'expense'.
Suggestion: expense
...ket, customers can satisfactorily go to expenses food which are not appropriate their in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... intriguing deals making a huge profit. Furthermore, this trend makes a paramoun...
^^
Line 3, column 864, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...tic manufactures have a mount of income an unexpected. In my own view, although I do not de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se hindrances to a nation in some ways.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, as to, for instance, sort of, such as, in some cases, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08980582524 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90837372311 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5800049785 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168380844194 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050008432751 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552039057482 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129574329617 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747471679541 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.