Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Other think students should spend time on other important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In modern times, there have been a surge in a deal of diverse suggestions being made to the study program for subjects included therein and even students. while some propose that a number of advantages can be had if science and preparation food subject are added in student’s course, others claim that academic subjects play a role more important than an aforementioned one.
On the one hand, there are loads of certain benefits can be gained by enrolling a subject of food. Firstly, scientific knowledge about food can be able to encourage learners to raise the awareness of health supporting their own diet habits. Because when they get significant insights about how food are constituted like proteins, fats, carbohydrates which effect directly to human’s health, they might go on a balance diet instead of absorbing fast food. Moreover, not only makes the subject a significant contribution on giving them proper knowledge to choose fresh and nutritious nourishment, but guide also students justly measures how to maintain food to prevent bacteria and even infectious diseases growth having in vegetation. By doing so, it might reduce the risk of getting foodborne illnesses, especially cancers.
On the other hand, in my perspective, I believe that students’ time should be allocated to the learning of academic subjects. The chiefly goal of educational institutes should focus on students’ pivotal end is that preparing carefully and adequately in term of academic knowledge for all of their learners so that they have valuable opportunities to get a ticket enrolling in appropriate universities. Furthermore, the evaluating students’ performances are primarily to take place on core subjects like Math, English, Physics, Literature and so on. Hence, if learners want to achieve highly expected academic results, obviously they need to concentrate on absorbing reservoir of knowledge related to aforementioned ones. Besides, it is likely that food science and preparation subject only places more emphasis on relieving stress and helping learners refresh themselves for a long time at school and it is introduced as side-subject on the timetable of extracurricular activities. In other words, students should not make every effort on this subject.
In conclusion, in spite of several benefits may be get by attending a subject relating to preparation and science food, I am still of opinion that students should devote their own time mainly to core subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...cts included therein and even students. while some propose that a number of advantage...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 697, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diseases'' or 'disease's'?
Suggestion: diseases'; disease's
...to prevent bacteria and even infectious diseases growth having in vegetation. By doing s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their own time mainly to core subjects.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, in conclusion, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39175257732 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05809585533 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6019243456 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.428571429 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295489254716 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103998067936 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847454486092 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187394834405 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519263350814 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.