The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two graphs illustrate the percentage of different vehicles and the proportion of purposes in using a car of the people who live in Edmonton.
Overall, car and LRT usage account for the most of traveling activities in the city, compared to bus and taxi. Furthermore, people use their car the most in order to go to work, do business and take their kid to school, rather than go shopping or having leisure activities.
Of the four means of transport, Edmonton citizens spend the highest percentage of their traveling by car with 45%. The second most common transport is LRT, just less than 10% compare to cars. In contrast, public transports like bus and taxi are not much popular in the city and have the same proportion of 10%.
As for cars, commuting to work and doing business are the main reasons that people use their own vehicle, with 55% and 45%, respectively. However, only 40% of all is reported to use cars so as to take their children to school. In contrast, cars are not used much when it comes to shopping, only 15% and it is the same as the percentage of leisure activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the traveling') or simply say ''most traveling''.
Suggestion: most of the traveling; most traveling
...rall, car and LRT usage account for the most of traveling activities in the city, compared to bus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...only 40% of all is reported to use cars so as to take their children to school. In contr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, so, as for, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61734693878 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57180815954 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.495097568 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143561404622 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649099884964 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299010982375 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925610968539 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243334409214 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.