The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.

The illustrations represent the changes of the place at Queen Mary Hospital between 1960 and 2000.

In overview, hospital, main road, and car park were the only structures remained for over the period, while other buildings had been built or modified.

In 1960, there were only four structures were available, which were shopping centre, farmland, hospital and car park. Within two decades from of it, hospital and car park remained as the same as the previous given diagram, while, pharmacy, a side building to hospital, and and cancer centre were replaced where the shopping centre used to be placed in. Also, farmland was substituted with nursing school.

Between 1980 and 2000, there were no dismantled, but relocated buildings. Cancer centre had expanded to the block where nursing school was used to be, although nursing school shifted to right side of it. In detail, the block car park used to be was split in to two facilities that are nursing school and car park.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... pharmacy, a side building to hospital, and and cancer centre were replaced where the s...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0245398773 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44398267187 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9873782759 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132470596779 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716269755217 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121699954155 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124555310723 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152308377472 0.0819641961636 186% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.