There has been quite an obvious discussion around the topic of university tuition fees. This argument seems to relate to the necessity of paying full cost by university students for their education. This writing will take a social persopective to discuss this issue.
In the current society, there is a common perception that university students should pay the full cost of their education. Under the assumption that university studies offer professional knowledge, it is reasonable to state that they enable students to obtain a reputable career, meaning that students should pay for the personal benefits they earn. Following this reasoning, there is convicing evidence to state that university students paying thier tuition fees are necessary in society.
Along with this, the opposing perspective should also be recognized. Considering the idea that professionalism of students is related to a nation’s development, it is quite acceptable to say that university studies are considered to be a public benefit as opposed to personal, leading to the fact that students should not be forced to pay the entire tuition fees. However, this aspect seems to be limited in that it only applies to the minority of society. Hence, it is quite obvious that the idea of university students not paying their tuition fees appears to be less convincing.
Upon thorough analysis, despite not needing to pay the full cost of university education by students, the fact that it only applies to the minority of society was more important. Hence, it can be elicited that university students should pay for their educational cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... related to a nation's development, it is quite acceptable to say that unive...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 8.36945812808 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30620155039 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87506254129 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480620155039 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8586818097 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.083333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.25397266985 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222171333951 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103960358882 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837622607094 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156075052538 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511581871567 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.