Most people with university degree can earn higher salaries than those who not go to the university, so they should pay full cost of their education. Your opinion.
It is true that people with higher education qualification earn more, compared to people who are not qualified. Hence, some people are arguing, that qualified people should pay the full cost of education, because they acheive more in their later life. This claim is not appropriate in several ways and this essay will discuss the reasons for recognising it as an unqualified statement.
Firstly, most of the people in this world have the access to free education. While some students get the full advantage of it, back benchers are wasting their time for unwaned activites. As an example, students with a dream always try to study hard, while others just play around and disturbing the class. As such, sometimes they are wasting the valuable resources provided by schools, and at the end, they fail to access universities or trade colleges to do further studies, and this resulted in getting low salary for the rest of their lives.
Therefore, it is crucial to analyse whether people who are getting paid more should pay the full cost of their education. It can be argued that, both categories get the same education from their educational provider. However, some people utilise it in effective manner while the others are taking it for granted. As an example, people who are not paying attention in their classes chose to be that way. Hence, it is not fair to ask more payments from someone who already succeeded, when the other has just not dedicated their life to acheive something as the previous.
To sum up, all students get the same learning from their schools and all have their preferences in studies. Therefore, it is not fair to request full cost of education from a student who succeeded in their life when others have not dedicated as much as successful people have done.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88852459016 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51581613498 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518032786885 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.71428571429 408% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8034112219 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288629924531 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10731603003 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842370499522 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180398520073 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577550110315 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 59.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.