Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? Your opinion
Recently, the phenomenon of determining creativity as an inborn skill has sparked a heated debate. I am inclined to believe, that it is not an inborn skill, but can be learned and developed through our lifetime. I will analyse this claim in below essay.
From general standpoint, most of the people think talents are genetic. this can be true to a certain extend, as there are thousands of examples in the world to prove this claim. As an example, according to a research conducted by the Yale University in 2015, most of the high end professionals have similar high end family background. Thus, genetics can be a strong implication for someone having creativity.
On the other hand, there are people in the world who developed their talents by their dedication and hardwork. As a tangible example, there are number of well known sceintists in the world who came from uneducated family backgrounds, but have contributed to the history immensly by their knowledge. creativity is the same, as no matter if you are born with it or not, if you can dedicate yourself and you can be a creative person oneday. Another, strong example is myslef, as I am not born with creativity, however, I am learning things online and trying them at home. I can see an immense development of myself.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments to both sides, but, I profoundly believe that creativity can be learn, even if you are not born with supporting genes.
|2019-08-22||Sidra018||77||Read full essay|
|firstname.lastname@example.org||55||Read full essay|
|2019-04-13||danushika||55||Read full essay|
|2018-05-21||Vaka143@2||93||Read full essay|
|2018-05-01||Vaka143@2||85||Read full essay|
- Most people with university degree can earn higher salaries than those who not go to the university, so they should pay full cost of their education. Your opinion.65
- Government promise continuous economic growth but it s actually an illusion Some people think that governments should abandon this Please talk about the validity and the implications72
- Technology allows us to have a useful and interesting life than in the past. Do you agree or disagree?72
- Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? Your opinion55
- Workers and nurses should be paid more What is your opinion70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...f the people think talents are genetic. this can be true to a certain extend, as the...
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
... genetic. this can be true to a certain extend, as there are thousands of examples in ...
Line 4, column 391, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
...can be a strong implication for someone having creativity. On the other hand, the...
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...he history immensly by their knowledge. creativity is the same, as no matter if you are bo...
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... it or not, if you can dedicate yourself and you can be a creative person oneday....
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.884 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79868826417 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.71428571429 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7348533092 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9230769231 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323969252502 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108833293413 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119881252691 0.071462118173 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203759633284 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11153427271 0.0609392437508 183% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.