Moving from rural areas to big cities will provide more opportunities. Your opinion.
Most people think major cities create more opportunities to people comapred to regional areas. Hence, the younger generation move from rural areas to towns to find better opportunities. This essay will demonstrate the validity of this claim.
It is an universal understanding that metropolitan areas have more opportunities compared to regional areas. The main reasons are, most of the well established businesses and government organisations are operate in cities. Therefore, people from regional areas have to visit metropolitan areas to get most of the things done. As such, people find it more easier to live in cities rather than in regional suburbs. Another example is, when there are more offices in a city, it creates better job opportunites. Hence, the demand for labor is higher in towns compared to other areas.
On the other hand, people can argue that villages also have chances to grow. However, it appears that the possibility is very low compared to urban areas. As an example, when a vacancy is advertised, most of the people in villages apply to it. As such, there is a high demand for a single position which make it challanging to get selected for a job. Not only that, but also, in regional areas most of the jobs are offered to people they know rather than advertising them. Hence, it is challanging to find an opportunity in villages.
To sum up, eventhough there are opportunities in regional areas, the demand and the competition is very high. Hence it is challenging to grasp a chance in villages compared to cities. However, in cities there are more opportunities compared to villages. This motivates the younger generation to move to bigger cities to get more opportunite and to be successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e the validity of this claim. It is an universal understanding that metropolit...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'operated'.
Suggestion: operated
...nesses and government organisations are operate in cities. Therefore, people from regio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...he things done. As such, people find it more easier to live in cities rather than in region...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...emand and the competition is very high. Hence it is challenging to grasp a chance in ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'grasping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: grasping
...n is very high. Hence it is challenging to grasp a chance in villages compared to cities...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, well, as to, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03135888502 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89476798317 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473867595819 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.5340892782 50.4703680194 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.0 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1052631579 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181929441892 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581300546217 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735370835025 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135111323071 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863904780496 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.