Computer and online games should be banned to students in schools as they have no educational value. What's your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of the requirement of computer games in children's life have sparked a heated debate. There are so many compelling arguments to both sides, however, I am inclined to believe that computer games destroy the future of our younger generation, hence, they should be banned from schools. I will analyse this argument below, and will provide sufficient evidence to prove my claim.
In general standpoint, many people find it easy to allow their kids to use computer games in their young age, as it helps parents to do their daily works without getting disrupted by kids. As a result, this has become an addiction to many children, and ultimately, they cut ties with their families. Not only that, but also, their interest for studies overtake by these addictive computer games.
As such, it is apperant that, computer games bring harm to our younger generation, and people should get necessary actions to reduce the damage. As an example, schools should ban computer games as they don't have any education value. Most importantly, kids just learn how to navigate keys faster and they also learn violent practices from playing online games. If kids can utilise that time for other important things such as, playing outdoor sports, it will enhance their physical value and contribute well for their health and wellbeing as well.
To conclude, eventhough there are lots of compelling arguments for both sides, I believe that computer games should be banned from schools, as they are not beneficial for the education of younger generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hools should ban computer games as they dont have any education value. Most importan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, well, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12549019608 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52550237483 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0587511593 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26065295658 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111495630722 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12286322437 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168070520179 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647215456942 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.