There has been quite an obvious discussion around the topic of online digital media. This argument seems to relate to the influence of increased online digital media on the role of library in universities. This writing will take a social perspective to discuss this issue.
In the current society, there is a common perception that universities should continue to update their textbooks in the library despite the increased digital media available online. Under the assumption that textbooks are more traditional form of learning material, it is reasonable to state that they are more easily accessible by people regardless of age, meaning that there is astill a need for universities to update their textbooks. Following this reasoning, there is convincing evidence that continuous updating textbooks in university libraries is worthwhile on society.
Along with this, the opposing perspective should also be recognized. Considering the idea that the current society is a technological era allowing people possess their personal devices, it is quite acceptable to say that people prefer to seek information through electronic forms, leading to the fact that it reduces the need for physical textbooks. However, this aspect seems to be limited in that it only applies to the minority of society. Hence, it is quite abvious that the idea of the reduced need for physical textbooks appears to be less convincing.
Upon thorough analysis, depite the reduced need for physical textbooks, the fact that it only applies to the minority of society was more important. Hence, it can be elicited that university libraries should continue to update their textbooks regardless the increased digital media available online.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 8.36945812808 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4531835206 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84961384478 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7158762316 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 7.25397266985 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265828690651 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112727432476 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886872098702 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177717564215 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695438543012 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.