The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas
which are prone to flooding.
The given diagram details the safety measures which are taken while constructing houses in the flood-prone areas
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the construction basics vary depending on the presence of a stopbank near the housing area.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, the area with a stopbank, which is constructed slightly higher than the 100-year flood level marking( up by a freeboard height-300mm), has a floodgate to stop the entrance of the river water in the locality and to drain out the collected rainwater back into the river. Moreover, the houses are raised above from the ground level to a height equivalent to the freeboard level so as to protect flooding from the internal ponding caused by the rainwater via internal runoff.
By contrast, the housing locality without any stopbank has a slightly different construction mechanism. Although the building is raised in a similar way as it is done in the area with the stopbank to safeguard the locality from the floodwater, however, the internal flooding is directed to flow back into the river directly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...eight equivalent to the freeboard level so as to protect flooding from the internal pond...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hanism. Although the building is raised in a similar way as it is done in the area with the stop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o flow back into the river directly.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, while, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21857923497 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87614477817 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6289198598 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.0 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6 22.9334400587 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203253445037 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107320137014 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747575365821 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14842340869 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993515264 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 61.2550243902 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.