The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.
The plans clearly exhibit the drastic alterations have been made in the school site in a variety of aspects. In a glance, there are 5 main amendments that appeal a first-time viewer.
First of all, the complex contains only 600 students in 2004, but the improvements make it possible for the school to support 1000 pupils in 2024. In order for this great enhancement to be realized, one building has been added to the school buildings. At the same time, buildings 1 and 2 are now connected to each other by means of a corridor. Additionally, a path has been constructed between building 3 from one side and buildings 1 and 2 on the other side to facilitate the commuting.
As parts of the previous sports field have been transformed to building 3, the remaining section also has been used as an excess parking for new teachers and employee. Sports field itself, as a result, has been conveyed to a much smaller area in the south of the initial place. Linking the main entrance and parking to the recently-built parking and sports field has led to constructing a long road in the southern region of the school site.
Overall, according to this plan the educational surface area will increase in 2024, but sports field area will dramatically diminish. It is also worth stating that some roads and pathways as well as a vast automobile parking will be added.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, well, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76050420168 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74502265088 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8947934914 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191232295727 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689259658313 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808409574639 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110817258418 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501776178564 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.