Making History A Mandatory Course In Universities
Undoubtedly, university students are the back bone of the future world. Therefore, the universities should plan to make them as aware, knowledgable, and skilled as possible. While some argue that fields such as humanities and social sciences are not worth studying, personally, I believe that students of all academic majors should pass history courses because they need it to reach career prospect and to build strong social relationships in future.
One of the primary causes is that history might be a necessity of the coming world societies. Needs of job market are altering, no one has an exact estimation of the demands of the future societies. Although technology, science and math are booming, and they are the most important requirements of a successful career, there is to insurance that in the future, fields such as humanities, history, and art will not become the essential needs of communities due to a demand for creativity at the job market.
Another aspect to consider is that learning history could be beneficial from a personal point of view. When the students enter their careers, they not only should deal with sophisticated technical problems, but also should cope with complicated social situations i.e. dealing with actual customers, potential customers, colleagues, and even their own family members. Since a thorough knowledge results in an effective, beneficial action, and history provides the firm basis for being aware of societies, thus, this is the history that could help students to mange their future relationships in the best manner. So, it is the universities' obligation to include this science in the programs of all academic disciplines.
In conclusion, I think that history should be a mandatory course for all the students because it aids them with their job prospect and making better social relationships. Now it is universities' turn to do their duty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nd to build strong social relationships in future. One of the primary causes is that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...strong social relationships in future. One of the primary causes is that histor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mand for creativity at the job market. Another aspect to consider is that learn...
^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'thorough knowledge'.
Suggestion: thorough knowledge
...nd even their own family members. Since a thorough knowledge results in an effective, beneficial act...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...ships in the best manner. So, it is the universities obligation to include this science in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... programs of all academic disciplines. In conclusion, I think that history shou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24342105263 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9260566432 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569078947368 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.9715790104 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236620597308 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862380265915 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721294409356 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158875549534 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105885576539 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.