The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
The bar graph demonstrates how many male and female people were using further education during three different academic years in UK. It also separates full-time learners from part-time learners.
Generally speaking, the number of people in further education has grown from 1970 to 1990, although men who enjoyed part-time education has shown decline.
The number of females who used part-time further education has increased from 800 thousands in 1970/71 to about 1,100,000 in 1990/91. Following a similar trend, those women who were in full-time education has grown from about 50,000 in 1970/71 to more than 200,000 in 1990/91.
The graphs also show that full-time male learners statistics has risen from about 70,000 in 1970/71 to about 260,000 in 1990/91. In contrast, part-time learners decreased from 1,000,000 in 1970/71 to about 950,000 in 1990/91 after a fluctuation in the middle of this period.
It is worth stating at this point that while the number of female people was less than male learners at the beginning of the period both in part-time and full-time graphs, the number of women who used part-time further education became more than men at the end of the period in 1990/91. Although as far as full-time education is concerned the number of men is still about 20,000 greater than women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'learners'' or 'learner's'?
Suggestion: learners'; learner's
...he graphs also show that full-time male learners statistics has risen from about 70,000 ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.220657277 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52733082299 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474178403756 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5353598519 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353970900134 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191034292317 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758549554137 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23657570506 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830556946863 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.