The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation

Essay topics:

The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation.

The maps depict modifications to the student accommodation from 2010 to the present day. Overall, the student accommodation underwent a complete transformation with various facilities being relocated, replaced or added.
Between 20100 and the present day, an en-suite room is added and it takes up a small space of the building's hallway. The kitchen is now not only serves food to eat, but also a social area for students to come there to chat and relax. A big parking lot is built for pupils to park their cars where there once was a garden.
Another major change to the area was the additional student bedrooms. The garden to the northwest of the building and the living room are replaced by two more bedrooms. Furthermore, in 2010, the building was a relatively green area with three gardens to the northwest, the north, and the south of the map. However, in the present day, only the northern one remains.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ed and it takes up a small space of the buildings hallway. The kitchen is now not only se...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80891719745 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71893214177 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624203821656 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0929137604 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8888888889 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118652190118 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527715990152 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646697968167 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088090198433 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632311096883 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.