The line graph illustrates the percentage of recycling rates of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics of one country between 1982 and 2010.
Overall, the proportion of paper and cardboard that was recycled was the highest among all four classes of material, but this experienced a downward trend after 1994, whereas there was a continuing upward trend in the recycling of the other materials.
In 1982, the recycling rates of paper and cardboard and glass wares were 65% and 50% respectively. While paper and cardboard briefly oscillated before skyrocketing to 80% in 1994, and then gradually declining to 70% in the end of the period; Plastics, on the other hand, took a nose dive to 40% in the year 1990 before steadily increasing to 60% in 2010.
Aluminium cans were first recycled in 1986, which grew steadily till 2002 at about a quarter, before rapidly soaring to nearly a half (45%). However this was not the case with plastics, despite being introduced late in the year 1990, was recycled at a significant low fraction (2%) at first, but continued to grow steady and then plateaued to almost one-tenth (8%) over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e rapidly soaring to nearly a half 45%. However this was not the case with plastics, de...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97948717949 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68933168854 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1498129673 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.833333333 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 5.23603664747 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128182837592 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072807592153 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447263385068 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864127057473 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376628335452 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.