The figure illustrates the process of collecting information and producing trustful weather forecasts at Australian Bureau of Meteorology.

Essay topics:

The figure illustrates the process of collecting information and producing trustful weather forecasts at Australian Bureau of Meteorology.

The figure illustrates the process of collecting information and producing trustful weather forecasts at Australian Bureau of Meteorology.
Generally, a computer plays an important role as a primary input and output device. The computer receives directly data from 3 sources which are satellite photo, radar screen and synoptic chart, then consoling all data and making weather reports transferring to audiences through 3 signals: TV, radio and recorded announcement.
The computer does not receive directly raw data which were collected by 3 types of equipment. In particular, satellite photo is taken by satellites that orbit around the earth with the mission of collecting weather information then send to computer for further analyzing. Meanwhile, radar screen come from radar equipment which ubiquitous placed in the world. Last, drifting buoy is in charge for providing synoptic chart to the computer.
In conclusion, weather forecasts are the results of 3 steps process which contain a lot of devices and analyzing works before publishing to media.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in conclusion, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5900621118 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91066530744 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1131626779 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310802786599 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16168881292 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.31987695328 0.0843802449381 379% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305394407233 0.15604864568 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.402576972115 0.0819641961636 491% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.