The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in British over the same time period.
The charts demonstrate the amount of money spent on children’s sports activities by their parents in Britain, as well as the number of children taking part in three distinct sports in a 7-year period from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, what stands out from these two charts is that there was a constant increase in the average spending in a month by British parents. Football figures, meanwhile, almost saw a level off throughout the period.
With regards to the parents spending money on movement activities, figures saw a steady increase, starting from 20 pounds in each month in 2008, and going up to approximately 33 pounds, more than one and half times the first amount.
Turning to the number of children participating in the sports, football stayed consistently the most popular one during this period with over 8 million participants. Swimming, however, despite going up in number of children during the period, and also attracting more attendance than athletics in 2008, around 2 million children as its first figure, athletics figures almost doubled to just below 5 million. In 2011, athletics and swimming entrants witnessed exactly the same number of children, 2.5 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: up
...pants. Swimming, however, despite going up in number of children during the period, and also...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17708333333 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74476695909 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4531512285 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356118743874 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144139729909 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117450754648 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194952405174 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136030179738 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.