The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts provide information about usage of energy in an average Australian household and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions which from this energy use.
Based on the first chart, there are some major sources of energy namely, heating, cooling, lightening, water heating, refrigeration and other appliances, as you can observe heating has the biggest share among other (42%) and in the next stand is water heating usage (30%). It is immediately apparent that water heating shares in both pie charts are approximately equal which indicate that consumption of this sources (30%) is respectively equal to its greenhouse gas production (32%).
Apart from this, percentage of some of the sources in the first chart include refrigeration, lightening and other appliances (7%-4%-15%)are respectively doubled in the second chart (14%-8%-28%) which shows the demerit of these for environment.
To narrow it down, as you can see, cooling and lightening both together would have slight impact on production of greenhouse gases. Other than this, heating is more better energy sources in production of greenhouse gases arena in Australia in comparison with other source.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...qual which indicate that consumption of this sources 30% is respectively equal to it...
^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... 32%. Apart from this, percentage of some of the sources in the first chart include refr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ouse gases. Other than this, heating is more better energy sources in production of greenho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43956043956 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88019546258 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5153991923 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.0 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308315361834 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160254680803 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152680015791 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216169188215 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158984601405 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.