the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment.
This flow chart demonstrates the effects of grass being flattened under the feet of tourists walking in the area on soil. According to the flow chart when they step on the soil it has direct two negative effects. On one hand it damages vegetation which will cause the plants to become weaker and interfere with their reproduction and growth too. Both of these consequences will reduce vegetation in that area. On the other hand trampling will also compact the soil underneath their feet, This compacted hard now soil has less air and water quality that will also inhibit plant growth and reproduction ,plus it will increase erosion, which means water will run off the land instead of going down in the soil. consequently, vegetation will reduce even more. As we could see on the chart the final result of these changes is erosion and decrease the quality of soil and vegetation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll cause the plants to become weaker and interfere with their reproduction and gr...
^^
Line 1, column 602, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...so inhibit plant growth and reproduction ,plus it will increase erosion, which mea...
^^
Line 1, column 710, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...land instead of going down in the soil. consequently, vegetation will reduce even more. As w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 730.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83443708609 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46588939321 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3688685371 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109703826984 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655599826428 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944528398371 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109703826984 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.