Given are one table and two pie charts. The table provides data of the sum of tourists to Ashdown museum while two charts demonstrate the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visits, during the same periods.
Given are one table and two pie charts. The table provides data of the sum of tourists to Ashdown museum while two charts demonstrate the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visits, during the same periods.
A glance at the table reveals the increase in the number of visitors. It is also evident from pie charts that people feel more satisfied when visiting the museum after refurbishment.
Beginning with the table, it is obvious that the number of tourists experiences a dramatic growth from 74,000 people to 92,000 people after the museum was refurbished.
Turning to pie charts, it can be seen that there are two opposite trends which are worth pointing out. The first one is the upward trend of the proportion of visitors who were extremely satisfied and those who were satisfied. The percentage of tourists extremely satisfied surge by 20%, from 15% to 35%. Likewise, this of who are satisfied shows a significant climb from 30% to 40% after the museum was renovated. In stark contrast, the rate of dissatisfied tourists and extremely dissatisfied ones plunged by 25% and 5%, respectively. The ratio of people who give no response maintain the same level of 5%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97536945813 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65710468273 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566502463054 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.476221296 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8181818182 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491144625148 0.215688989381 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175701794626 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.242673527664 0.0843802449381 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334824010767 0.15604864568 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.385821571899 0.0819641961636 471% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.