Due to having a more comfortable working life, some people believe that workers should only follow an occupation. While I admit that this option can bring about many beneficial advantages, I would argue that a number of adverse consequences would be generated.
Due to having a more comfortable working life, some people believe that workers should only follow an occupation. While I admit that this option can bring about many beneficial advantages, I would argue that a number of adverse consequences would be generated.
On the one hand, it is evident that pursuing a career path can result in numerous helpful influences. Firstly, people are likely to have professional skills referring to their jobs. On account of a long time working in a field, workers could deeply understand the specific features of these tasks. Thereby, their relevant skills can also be improved day by day. Also, people who only chase an employment could be more effortless to settle down. No changes in job help them have a stable salary and an easily predictable future. They do not have to spend time moving house or wrestling with interview and application. It is a superb situation to maintain a peaceful life.
In stark contrast, there are several potential detrimental impacts of following just an initial career path. The primary effect is that people might lose enthusiasm. It is obvious that hobby is likely to be changed or some people have to undergo a long period before recognizing their genuine dream. For instance, despite Steve Jobs’ bright future of his career with technology development, he used to decide on meditation as his desire. Another reason for trying various jobs is that you would have more opportunities to discover interesting things. Working in diverse environments allows you to make new friends and learn more typical skills. By this way, this choice could give you a more spicy life.
By way of conclusion, I would therefore hold the view that although there are some rewarding affects of current trend to pursuing one occupation, they are outweighed by the disadvantageous consequences.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13201320132 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81308175613 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630363036304 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8920681361 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3888888889 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465889837402 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116262966477 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1585060985 0.0667982634062 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335465321517 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.353155849477 0.056905535591 621% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.