The given diagram shows the process of making water clock.
The given diagramatic representation illustrates the process of making water clock. It is clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that the water colck is made using some equipments such as; two plastic bottles, stand ,tape, glue, straw, tap for water.
Firstly, two bottles are attached with the stand. The first one is fixed with the help of tape above the other whose head is cut off. Two hole are pierced in the bottle fixed with tape, first at the bottom so that water can fall in the form of drops in another bottle whereas, second hole is made near the neck of bottle which is attached with straw so that excess water can drain out. The second bottle is marked with marker to note the level of water. Hence, this appratus is kept under runing tap to fill the first bottle by covering the bottom hole with finger. Once the bottle is filled with water, finger is removed and water starts flowing in the form of drops in the bottle kept below.
Overall, this appratus is used to note the time with the help of water therefore, it is known as water clock.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ents such as; two plastic bottles, stand ,tape, glue, straw, tap for water. Fir...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, second, so, therefore, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52820512821 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15612821717 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.0809950859 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189289522782 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992474421272 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145931605866 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183357802383 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135615473951 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.