The line graph illustrates information about the expenditure of fast food from 1970 to 1990. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there was an upward trend in both Hamburger and Fish and Chips consumption, while the expenditure of Pizza saw a slight decline.
Looking at the details, as regards Hamburger, the figure increased slightly in 15 years period from 1970 to 1985, and then jumped to 300 grams in 1990. If we look at Fish and Chips, the trend was similar to Hamburger, which started from less than 100 grams, and then rose gradually to approximately 150 grams in 1980. After that consumption witnessed a dramatic growth in the next 10 years, it reached its peak in 1990, at 500 grams. By contrast, the consumption of Pizza went in the opposite direction. It started at its highest level and then decreased negligibly to 200 grams until 1985. From 1985 to 1990, the figure remained stable at 200 grams.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75903614458 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5780035846 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9886817932 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206223068532 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912028126364 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101444101338 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164271031205 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101169483297 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.