The given maps illustate data about layout of the civic centre recently and proposal for new one. Overall, there are some disparities significantly in project compared to one currently. \ .

Essay topics:

The given maps illustate data about layout of the civic centre recently and proposal for new one. Overall, there are some disparities significantly in project compared to one currently. \
.

The given maps illustate data about layout of the civic centre recently and proposal for new one. Overall, there are some disparities significantly in project compared to one currently. Also, the A.Avenue will become more modernised with development of some amenities.
As is obsevered from the graph, Car park which is located on the conert of left side is expected to deconstruct and make away for Theatre. Similarly, one being on the corner of the right hand has proposed to transformed into Hotel and restaurant. It is interesting to note that Council office has moved to alter for exhibition hall that recently is situated on the below of car park. Following the plan, exhition hall will make alternation for library that currently being on the right of council. Furthermore, Afer movement of council, this place will be enlarged and converted into open park and underground car park. It is prominent that Concert Hall being between 2 car parks in the existing map will still be the same place. Resembly, shopping centre next the car park will not change in the future project. 3 streets namely D.S , B.S, C.S will be main streets in the civic centre.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Avenue
... compared to one currently. Also, the A.Avenue will become more modernised with develo...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed with development of some amenities. As is obsevered from the graph, Car park...
^^
Line 2, column 834, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... the future project. 3 streets namely D.S , B.S, C.S will be main streets in the ...
^
Line 2, column 835, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the future project. 3 streets namely D.S , B.S, C.S will be main streets in the ci...
^^
Line 2, column 840, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...uture project. 3 streets namely D.S , B.S, C.S will be main streets in the civic ...
^
Line 2, column 845, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... project. 3 streets namely D.S , B.S, C.S will be main streets in the civic centr...
^
Line 2, column 845, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... project. 3 streets namely D.S , B.S, C.S will be main streets in the civic centr...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, similarly, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91326530612 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64341776913 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627551020408 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9998032262 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318738052303 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149303273048 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.228982361552 0.0843802449381 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.422745751761 0.15604864568 271% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.333598337297 0.0819641961636 407% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.