The given table chart shows data about the total value in billions of dollars of imported fish to the US while the bar chart illustrate percentage of shown countries in terms of fish provision to the US.
The given table chart shows data about the total value in billions of dollars of imported fish to the US while the bar chart illustrate percentage of shown countries in terms of fish provision to the US. Overall, an increase can be seen in the total value of imported fish in the period of 12 years. Also, the primary source of fish imported to the US came from China and Canada in shown time.
As is observed from the graph that in 1988 the total value of imported fish gained 6.57 billions of dollars. In the following 4 years, this figure had risen considerably to reach 8.52 billions of dollars. Additionally, this tendency proceeded in the period of next 8 years, 10.72 billions of dollars was the total value that was spent on to import fish. It is interesting to note in 1988 that 60% of the quality of imported fish was from Canada. However, this proportion was only halve in 2000, at approximately 28%. Regarding contribution of china, this nation provided 13% in total but had an upsurge in 2000, with the figure reaching 30%. The percentage of others showed a rise remarkably, climbing from 27% in 1998 to 46% in 1992. Subsequently, the period of 1992 to 2000 witnessed a slightly decline and stood at 42% in the share.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me from China and Canada in shown time. As is observed from the graph that in 1988...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e from China and Canada in shown time. As is observed from the graph that in 19...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '57 billion'.
Suggestion: 57 billion
...e total value of imported fish gained 6.57 billions of dollars. In the following 4 years, this...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '52 billion'.
Suggestion: 52 billion
...igure had risen considerably to reach 8.52 billions of dollars. Additionally, this tendency pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '72 billion'.
Suggestion: 72 billion
...eeded in the period of next 8 years, 10.72 billions of dollars was the total value that was sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 795, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...y, the period of 1992 to 2000 witnessed a slightly decline and stood at 42% in the share.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58371040724 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57054199836 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533936651584 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9150089681 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0909090909 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487112720348 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173675301079 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.270862755739 0.0843802449381 321% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.46020124329 0.15604864568 295% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.297575692974 0.0819641961636 363% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.