The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of mear in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph demostrates fish consumption and three kinds of meat consumption namely chicken,beef and lamb in a Europian nation in the range of year from 1979 to 2004.
The graph is about grams per person per week verses fish and meat consumption in which consumption of beef and lamb was gradually reduced at the end of 2004, chicken's increased and fish's remained almost constant.
From 1979 to somewhere 1989, people consumed beef nearly 200 grams per week and then it was decreased almost gradually until 2004. Chicken consumption was augmented from around 150 grams to near 250 grams between year 1979 to 2004. As similar to consumption of beef, food intake of lamb also went down from a little less to 150 grams to slightly greater than 50 grams. Also, averagely, fish was eaten to nearby 50 grams throughout the time period.
Hence, from the chart, it seems that inhabitants of Europian country consumed more chicken while ingestion of beef and lamb is significantly reduced in somewhere around two decades. But, citizens used to eat fish varieties at almost constant consumption rate throughout the span of 25 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , beef
...kinds of meat consumption namely chicken,beef and lamb in a Europian nation in the ra...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...umption namely chicken,beef and lamb in a Europian nation in the range of year fr...
^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f Europian country consumed more chicken while ingestion of beef and lamb is sign...
^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consumption rate throughout the span of 25 years.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01058201058 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60998378177 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2899219673 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150359540194 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075516006919 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542403282767 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111747988302 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481735284331 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.