The graph and chart below give information about the number of new graduates and theiremployment in the UK from 1992 to 2002.

Essay topics:

The graph and chart below give information about the number of new graduates and their

employment in the UK from 1992 to 2002.

The diagrams illustrate the information about the number of fresh graduates and their professions in the United Kingdom in the ten years.

Overall, there was an upward trend in the number of graduates and the number of the occupant in two positions (professional and managerial & administrative) decreased by time.

Regarding the first diagram, the number of graduates was initially 165 thousand, rising exponentially to about 195 thousand in the next five years before falling by 150 thousand in 2002.

Moving to the second chart, 60 thousand people were professional employees in 1992 and this number decreased by approximately 5 thousand in the following five years, finishing the year 2002 at around 40 thousand workers. While the number of managers and administrative staff was a third that of professional in the initial year, declining by 3 thousand in 1997 before stabilized in the following five years. In contrast, the people working as clerical & secretarial and sales witnessed an increasing number in the period. The number of clerical & secretarial stood just below 5 thousand in the first year, doubling in 1997, and saw hardly any change in last year. People working as sales commenced at 2.5 thousand in 1992, climbing by 1-2 thousand every next five year.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, third, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94898923989 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531707317073 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4163650693 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171563639756 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851824649581 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465378052412 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124318344164 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301933066884 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.