The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle number and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph and chart illustrate how the number of vehicles in England and Wales generate the amount of CO2 emission.
To begin with, according to first graph, it is clearly seen that the number of vehicles will increase stably between period 2000 and 2020. a amount of vehicle in England and Wales was approximately 20 millions in 2000. However, the given graph anticipates that the number of vehicles will rise up by around 60 millions in 2020.
Meanwhile, according to second chart, the amount of CO2 emission also will grow as time goes by. The largest amount of CO2 emission were generated by cars. The second highest vehicle that cause CO2 emission was trucks. In addition, buses and vans have been following the next.
In conclusion, as the number of vehicles expanded more, it is definitely seen that the amount of CO2 emission also have been increasing. Hence, people should diminish the number of vehicles in order to prevent the amount of CO2 emission from expanding in England and Wales.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...se stably between period 2000 and 2020. a amount of vehicle in England and Wales ...
^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...se stably between period 2000 and 2020. a amount of vehicle in England and Wales ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92397660819 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46536835111 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6968452689 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278596148248 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123102243096 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589156170608 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187766234103 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458970551724 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.