The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The graph illustrates how the amount of water used worldwide changed from 1900 to 2000 in Brazil and Congo.
Overall, the agriculture was the largest contribution to water waste over the period, while Industrial use and Domestic
use indicate steadily increase. The Brazil showed significant consuming compared to Congo.
In the first survey, the Industrial use and Domestic were starting at the same point, reaching almost 1km. However, the largest
quantity of water was used for agricultural, approximately half of the 1000㎦. In 1950, 1000㎦ was spent by crop production and there was a slight gap beween factor-made and family use.
Water consumption from Industrial use and Domestic use sectors were
1000㎦ and 250㎦ respectively in 2000. Finally, it may see clearly that the agriculture reached their peak 3000㎦.
The table presents the difference in water waste in two different countries by contrasting the amount of irrigated land, experienced
26,500km2 and 100km2 in Brazil and Congo respectively. This reflected in the figures for water consumption per person: 359m²
compared with the only 8m² in the Congo. with a population of 176 million, the figures for Brazil were 3.5 times larger than that of
Congo.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... agriculture reached their peak 3000㎦. The table presents the difference in wat...
^^^
Line 13, column 42, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...ompared with the only 8m² in the Congo. with a population of 176 million, the figure...
^^^^
Line 14, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e 3.5 times larger than that of Congo.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48969072165 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90327015186 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2622361565 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8181818182 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 3.83414634146 261% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265501827975 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973982441679 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828871197756 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111943136784 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092214448943 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.