The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line chart illustrates the number of global water that three various sectors used from 1900 to 2000, in a duration of 100 years and the table provides sufficient information about the water consumption by every person in brazil, and Democratic Republic of Congo. Overall, as it can be seen agriculture was the most user of global water and Brazilian people consumped water about 45 times more than Congo people.
As is given in the chart, agriculture instanted with about 500 km3 of using global water and gradualy increased to almost 3000 in the last year of time span, while industrial and domestic uses reached a level out trend between 1900 and 1940. After that a moderate rise was be accured and industrial and domestic uses stood on roughly 1000 and nearly 300 in the last year of period respectively.
On the other hand, brazil by 176 million people and 26500 km2 irrigated land consumpted water a little less than 360 m3 per person, whereas Congo people used 8m3 of the water personally by 5.2 million people and 100 km2 land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...nd 1940. After that a moderate rise was be accured and industrial and domestic use...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75138121547 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45144540364 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629834254144 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8856972383 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260420335924 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139906442264 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731774040976 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172281712461 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751648977881 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.