The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The graph and table given illustrate the information about water consumption worldwide and in two different countries respectively.
As it can be seen from the graph for water consumption over the last century, agriculture has always been the largest consumer of water. In 1900 water consumption in agriculture was about 500 cubic kilometres which increased over 100 years to about 3000 cubic kilometres in 2000. In the following place is the industrial use that was much less as compared to agriculture, only about 100 cubic kilometres in 1900, which was almost the same until 1950. After 1950 water usage in industries worldwide significantly increased in a much greater rate, to about 1100 cubic kilometres in 2000. Domestic usage had a similar trend as industries until 1950 which was almost stagnant. Later the consumption reached about 500 cubic kilometres in 2000.
From the table for water consumption of Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo, it is evident that Brazil has much larger population in 2000, nearly 35 times that of Congo. Brazil had much larger irrigated land too. But what is more important is the water usage per person that is stunningly huge in Brazil (359 m3) in comparison to Congo (8 m3).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...s the industrial use that was much less as compared to agriculture, only about 100...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05940594059 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7709199294 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8221753463 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316655025611 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13936485085 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149348176043 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283345459087 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189175776013 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.