The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts the figures of 2025.
Given line graph demonstrates the information about the consumption and production of the energy in two ways: imports and projections by US from 1950 to 2000.
It can be seen that, in starting, the production of energy in 1950 was 25. Furthermore, there were small fluctation and afterwards, it increased continuously and reached to 60 units in 1997. Apart from that, again there was fluction in the production and it rises to 75 units from 1997 to 2000. Moreover, there were imports of production between 1995 and 2000. At the last, there were slightly increased in production and it will reached to 80 units in 2025. At last, projection of production was done.
On the other hand, startingly, the cosumption of energy was 35 units in year 1950. Afterthat, there were fluctions and again it starts increased and reached to 55 units in 1975. Furthermore, there were again fluctions from the year 1975 to 2000. Moreover, there were import of the consumption. Apart from that, in 2000, the comsumpation of energy were 95 units. At last, consumption will increased to 130 units in 2025 and at the end projections is done.
Overall, it ia evident that, in both the consumption and production of energy, consumption of energy is more as compare to the production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reach'
Suggestion: reach
...tly increased in production and it will reached to 80 units in 2025. At last, projectio...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ere 95 units. At last, consumption will increased to 130 units in 2025 and at the end pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...f energy, consumption of energy is more as compare to the production.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92523364486 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8907978789 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434579439252 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4288961022 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2857142857 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251710222046 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974909236774 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780214074942 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194165077058 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637519079518 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.