The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with the projections until 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates trends in US fuel energy consumption since 1980 and predicting results by the 2030, information was collected in 2008.
As can be seen from the graph, petrol and oil appear to be a leading type of fuel for Americans and have an upward trend with the passage of the whole period. The intake began with 35 quadrillion units, following with double drop above 30 units, it will be increased broadly from the 1995 onwards.
Turning to the coal and natural gas performance, we notice that significantly less people prefer these types of energy. Their usage proportions are quite erratic, with exceptions to projections for the foreseeable decade. In 1980 the coal hovered around 20 quadrillion units, when consumption of natural gas was slightly less (above 15 quadrillion units). In 2030 coal and gas are predicted to reach its maximum at 30 and 25 quadrillion units per year, respectively.
From 1980 to 1990 the remaining variety of energy fuel have roughly similar patterns fluctuating at the 4 quadrillion unit level. But during the following years the nuclear energy has been increasing moderately with projections to be well above 8 quadrillion unit by the end of investigated period. The solar and wind and hydropower sources of energy continued to have similar tendency in consumption until 2010 and then solar and wind fuel consumption will be increasing their indicators gradually, and it appears to reach 5 quadrillion units by the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rformance, we notice that significantly less people prefer these types of energy. Th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0693877551 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87754812563 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567346938776 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.414645215 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162753429893 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698854553905 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636220717896 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120321956835 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763992243302 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.