The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The mentioned graph illustrates the history and projections about use five different types of energy in the USA from 1980 until 2030.
Overall, as is represented by the graph, the utilization of fossil fuels was in the first position and is expected to maintain its status in future whereas renewable sources were consumed at the lowest ratio and it is estimated that it will remain low in near future.
It is clear from the graph that the conventional sources of energy such as petrol and oil, natural gas and coal were dominant sources of energy with the figure of 35 ,20 , more than 15 quadrillion units in 1980 while it is also forecasted that demand of these energies will remain higher in future and will reach upto summit, 30 and nearly 25 quadrillion units respectively.
Likewise, previously, the consumption nuclear energy was less than 5 quadrillion units which is forecasted to increase gradually in coming days. Moreover, the non- conventional energy such as solar, wind and hydropower accounted for less than 5 quadrillion while solar and wind energy is going to slightly rise whereas hydropower will remain constant after 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... sources of energy with the figure of 35 ,20 , more than 15 quadrillion units in 1...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rces of energy with the figure of 35 ,20 , more than 15 quadrillion units in 1980 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, moreover, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07894736842 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73221188258 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3560976956 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.0 112.824112599 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8 5.23603664747 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209328223694 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127532997998 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130061106176 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149145493425 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137247971023 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.