The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the consumption of energy from 1980 to 2019, and projected consumption to 2030.
According to the given data, petrol and oil are the dominant fuel sources through the period, with 35q units used in 1980, rising to 41q units in 2019. Despite some initial fluctuation, from 1995 there was a steady increase. this is predicted to continue, reaching 47q in 2030.
In 1980, the consumption of energy natural gas and coal was nearly similar, about 20q and 16q respectively. From 1985 to 2019, gas showed an initial fall, while coal gradually increased. They finally ended up at 30q and 23q in 2030.
At the same time, energy from nuclear, hydro and solar/wind power were equal at only 4q. In 1995, nuclear rose by 5q, while other energy sources remained constant at 3q. after slight increases, hydropower fell back to 1980 figure. It is expected to maintain this level until 2030, while the others will increase slightly after 2025.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... from 1995 there was a steady increase. this is predicted to continue, reaching 47q ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...energy sources remained constant at 3q. after slight increases, hydropower fell back ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95031055901 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47912468017 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67701863354 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4732729543 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.4545454545 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6363636364 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173349596865 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668942434238 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743485175384 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13133216807 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926785393242 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.