The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The graph illustrates the data from a report in 2002 in USA about consumption of energy with projections since 1980 until 2030.
it is clear that the quadrillion units of most energy consumptions are expected to increase during the research period. However the figure of hydropower consumption is predicted to stand at the same amount.
In 1980, the consumption rate of petro and oil was highest, at 35 quadrillion units, while the number of group of natural gas and coal were lower at 20 and approximately 17 quadrillion units. At the same time, other three kinds of energy had the same amount of consumption at about 3 quadrillion units. In 2010, whereas the other five sorts of energy in used were gradually growth, hydropower had some flexible and forecasted to drop back to the same amount as in the first phase of project.
In 2030, petro and oil are predicted to rise dramatically and reach the highest peak at 50 quadrillion units, as coal and natural gas go up to 32 and 25 quadrillion units. it happens the same with nuclear and solar/wind with the trends grow to 9 and 7 quadrillion units meanwhile hydropower is stable at 3 quadrillion units as about 20 years before that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...th projections since 1980 until 2030. it is clear that the quadrillion units of ...
^^
Line 2, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...to increase during the research period. However the figure of hydropower consumption is...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s go up to 32 and 25 quadrillion units. it happens the same with nuclear and solar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74879227053 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80838005436 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531400966184 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2287522684 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.875 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230621755794 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133698416672 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197596304258 0.0843802449381 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224732868361 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.247827897896 0.0819641961636 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.